Take the District of Columbia back to court
In Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court wrote: “In sum, we hold that the District’s ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.” [Slip Op at 64; bold added. See also Slip Op at 56, describing the District’s statute as requiring “that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock at all times, rendering it inoperable.” Italics added.][pP]>oxygen 6020 crack
Despite the clarity of the court’s holding, the District has decided to retain its requirement that handguns be trigger locked. Accordingly, residents of the District should lawyer up.[pP]>oxygen 6020 crack