Obama is intellectually dishonest
“Change”? No, this is run-of-the-mill piffle:
The reality of gun ownership may be different for hunters in rural Ohio than for those plagued by gang-violence in Cleveland, but don’t tell me we can’t uphold the Second Amendment while keeping AK-47s out of the hands of criminals.
• The “reality” of gun ownership is different for those plagued by gang violence. Their need for guns is greater than the hunter’s. Self-defense is a necessity; hunting is a luxury.
• Do you know anyone who supports putting AK-47s into the hands of criminals? Supporters of the Second Amendment have never had it as their objective to arm criminals, and to suggest otherwise is a lie.
• Why is this mendacious, formulaic politician billed as an agent of change? What, exactly, is the change?